TL;DR
Meta will begin cutting 8,000 jobs on May 20 and report record quarterly revenue of $56.31 billion, as the company ramps up spending on AI infrastructure to $145 billion in 2026. Employee morale has plummeted, with internal protests over surveillance software, a decline in compensation and more layoffs expected in the fall.
goal will begin cut approximately 8,000 jobs on May 20the largest round of layoffs the company has undertaken since its 2023 restructuring, in a move that lays bare the scale of Mark Zuckerberg’s bet that AI infrastructure is worth more than the people it replaces. The company is also canceling 6,000 open applications, bringing the effective workforce reduction to 14,000 positions.
The cuts come not during a recession but during a period of record financial performance. Meta reported Q1 2026 revenue of $56.31 billion and net income of $26.8 billion. Full-year 2025 revenue was $201 billion, up 22 percent year-over-year, with free cash flow of $43.6 billion. The company is not downsizing because it is struggling. It is shrinking because it has decided that the performance of AI infrastructure exceeds the performance of human labor, and it is converting one into the other on a scale no technology company has attempted before.
The financial arithmetic
Meta has raised its 2026 capital spending guidance to between $125 billion and $145 billion, up from $72.2 billion in 2025 and $39.2 billion in 2024. Almost all of the increase is aimed at data centers, Nvidia GPUs, custom silicon and infrastructure to support the company’s Llama model ecosystem and recommendation systems. In the first quarter alone, Meta added $107 billion in new contractual commitments for cloud and infrastructure deals, and has committed $27 billion to a joint venture with Nebius for a gigawatt-scale AI data center campus in Louisiana.
Bank of America has estimated that the layoffs could generate $7 billion to $8 billion in annualized savings, a fraction of the capital spending plan but a significant contribution to the operating margin that Chief Financial Officer Susan Li has pledged to protect. Li told investors during the company’s first-quarter earnings call that the company believed a more efficient operating model would allow it to move more quickly while helping offset its infrastructure investments. He also acknowledged that executives “don’t really know what the optimal size of the company will be in the future,” a notable admission from a CFO whose company is simultaneously reporting record profits.
The 💜 of EU technology
The latest rumors from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise founder Boris and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Register now!
The arithmetic is stark: Meta is spending more on AI infrastructure in a single year than the combined annual revenue of most Fortune 500 companies, and it’s financing some of that spending by eliminating the jobs of the people who helped build the business that generates the revenue in the first place.
What is happening within the company?
The financial arguments in favor of restructuring are coherent. Human experience of this is considerably less so. Meta’s record quarterly results They were reported three weeks before layoff notices went out, a sequence that has produced what employees and industry observers have described as a particularly corrosive form of corporate dissonance.
Zuckerberg held a company-wide town hall on April 30 to directly address the cuts. He was explicit about one thing: AI tools were not causing job losses. “Getting everyone to use AI tools internally and doing work more efficiently is not what is causing layoffs,” he said. However, he did not identify what was driving them and the silence has fueled anxiety throughout the company.
Meanwhile, Meta has been cutting compensation for the broader workforce while dramatically increasing it for AI researchers. Median total compensation at Meta fell from $417,400 in 2024 to $388,200 in 2025. The stock portion of the annual raises was reduced by 5 percent in February 2026, on top of a 10 percent reduction the year before. At the same time, Zuckerberg has been personally recruiting AI researchers with compensation packages reportedly reaching $100 million to staff Meta Superintelligence Labs, the division he launched last year under former Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang.
The gap between those two realities—shrinking salaries for most employees and nine-figure packages for a select few—has produced what multiple reports describe as an atmosphere of resignation. Employees have created at least three countdown websites tracking the days until May 20, one of which bears the heading “Big, Beautiful Firing.” Data from Blind, an anonymous professional network that requires work email verification, shows that Meta’s overall employee rating has dropped 25 percent from its peak in the second quarter of 2024, with a 39 percent drop in its culture rating. In every category except compensation, Meta now underperforms Amazon, Google, and Netflix.
The question of surveillance
Compounding the mood is a program called the Model Capability Initiative, which Meta rolled out to U.S. employees’ work laptops in April. The software captures mouse movements, clicks, keystrokes and screenshots in a designated set of work applications. Meta has said the data is used to teach AI agents how humans navigate the software, not as a general surveillance tool. Employees at several US offices have responded with visible protestdistributing flyers that described the program as an “employee data mining factory” and citing the National Labor Relations Act. Workers characterized the tool as “dystopian” and created an online petition urging Zuckerberg to shut it down, with some reporting that their work computers have slowed down noticeably since the program was installed.
The objection is not simply about privacy. It’s all about the implication: Meta is asking its remaining employees to generate the training data that will teach the AI systems to replicate the computer usage patterns of the same roles that are being eliminated. The program may well be a legitimate research initiative, but its timing, weeks before mass layoffs, has made it impossible for employees to read it as anything more than a preview of their own obsolescence.
The restructuring pattern
Including the May round, Zuckerberg has overseen the elimination of about 33,000 positions since 2022. The 2022 cuts corrected pandemic-era overhiring. The 2023 round was proposed as a “year of efficiency.” The early 2025 cuts were presented as performance management. The January and March 2026 reductions, which eliminated approximately 1,700 employees from Reality Labs, recruiting and other divisions, were the target. The May round is different: It’s a company-wide structural reorganization affecting all major business units, with teams reconstituted into AI-focused “pods” under Wang’s Superintelligence Labs division.
More layoffs are expected this year, including a possible round in August and another in the fall, according to people with knowledge of the plans. Previous reports suggested the total reduction could eventually reach 20 percent of the workforce.
Meta isn’t the only one converting payroll to capex in AI. Microsoft announced its first voluntary retirement program the same week, offering buyouts to about 7 percent of its American workforce. Oracle laid off about 30,000 employees in March. Amazon cut 16,000 corporate jobs in the first quarter. Across the tech sector, nearly 110,000 jobs have been lost at 137 companies so far in 2026, according to Layoffs.fyi, after roughly 125,000 cuts in all of 2025.
the bet
The theory behind Meta’s restructuring is that a smaller number of highly talented people working alongside powerful AI systems can accomplish what previously required entire departments. Zuckerberg has described the vision as developing AI-powered products that amount to a kind of “personal superintelligence” for billions of users. The Superintelligence Labs division, AI-focused pods, and huge infrastructure spending are all geared toward that goal.
Whether the bet pays off depends on whether the AI systems Meta is building at a cost of more than $100 billion a year can generate enough incremental revenue, through better ad targeting, content recommendations, and new AI-powered products, to justify both the infrastructure spending and the loss of institutional knowledge that comes with eliminating 10 percent of the workforce in a single month.
The human cost of the AI shift in the technology industry It is not evenly distributed. The roles being eliminated at Meta focus on recruiting, sales, middle management, and non-AI-adjacent product work, areas where the skills gap between what employees currently do and what the company needs now is too wide to be bridged by incremental retraining. The positions for which the company is actively hiring, with salaries between $62,000 for entry-level positions and $240,000 or more for senior AI research scientists, are almost entirely in machine learning, infrastructure engineering, computer vision and natural language processing.
Zuckerberg has been through this before. The 2023 efficiency program, which produced 21,000 job cuts in two waves, was followed by a period of exceptional financial performance that silenced critics and sent stocks to record highs. This time, the market has been less forgiving: Meta shares are down about 7 percent so far this year, underperforming all mega-cap peers except Microsoft. The broader Big Tech pattern in 2026 suggests that investors are rewarding the same playbook at every company that adopts it: reduce headcount, redirect savings to AI infrastructure, and let the stock price validate the decision.
For the 8,000 people who will receive notifications this week, the validation will be from someone else. For Zuckerberg, the question is whether personal superintelligence, a product that does not yet exist, can justify a restructuring whose costs are immediate, measurable and borne by people who did nothing wrong except work in roles that an algorithm has not yet learned to play.
