TL;DR
Mrs. Dow Jones says the American dream is dead for young Americans, who are turning to gambling as traditional avenues to wealth become inaccessible.
The American dream is “very dead” for millennials and Generation Z, according to financial influencer Haley Sacks, better known as Mrs. Dow Jones. In an interview with Business InsiderSacks argued that traditional indicators of middle-class success—home ownership, stable careers, and retirement savings—have become functionally inaccessible to younger Americans, pushing them toward gambling and side businesses as alternative paths to wealth.
The statement comes against a backdrop of record numbers in the US gaming industry. The American Gaming Association reported that U.S. commercial gaming revenues reached nearly $79 billion in 2025, an all-time high, with sports betting revenues reaching nearly $17 billion, up approximately 23 percent year over year, and iGaming revenues surpassing $10 billion for the first time.
Young Americans are driving a significant portion of that growth. A 2026 Northwestern Mutual survey found that 32 percent of Gen Z respondents and 24 percent of millennials participate in or are considering sports betting, rates far higher than those of older age groups.
The 💜 of EU technology
The latest rumors from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise founder Boris and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Register now!
Sacks, a Fortune 40 Under 40 awardee and founder of the financial education company Finance is Cool, frames the change as rational rather than reckless. Their argument is that when a starter home costs multiples of a young worker’s annual salary and student debt averages about $33,000 for millennials and $22,000 for Gen Z, the game starts to look like one of the few opportunities available for a life-changing sum of money.
Economic data offers some support for the underlying frustration. A Beyond Finance survey from March 2026 found that more than 70 percent of Gen Z and millennial respondents described their spending as “survival mode,”covering the essentials leaving little to save or invest. Financial anxiety manifests itself in other ways toowith college graduates booing commencement speakers who tell them AI will transform their careers as the entry-level job market shrinks around them.
But the jump from economic frustration to gambling as a wealth strategy is where the argument runs into trouble. A joint study by researchers at UCLA, USC, and Harvard found that the introduction of online sports betting in one state was associated with a ten percent increase in the likelihood of bankruptcy among young adults. States that added mobile betting saw a 25 percent increase.
Researchers found that the convenience of telephone gambling, available 24 hours a day and without the need to go to a casino, was a key factor in financial difficulties. The pattern is particularly concentrated among men under 35, the same demographic that sportsbooks’ advertising targets most aggressively.
Gambling addiction among young Americans is rising along with income. NPR has reported on a growing number of young adults experiencing gambling-related debt, and counselors noted that many entered sports betting through free bet promotions and social media advertising that framed betting as a skill-based investment rather than a game of chance.
Sacks acknowledged in the Business Insider interview that the game is not a financial plan, but argued that the push behind it reveals something real about how disconnected traditional financial advice has become from the economic reality facing people under 40. He pointed out the gap between the advice young people receive—constantly saving, investing in index funds, buying a home—and a real estate market and work environment that make following that advice seem impossible.
The tension between these two realities is not new, but its scale is. Tech layoffs are framed as an AI transformation have eliminated tens of thousands of entry-level and mid-career positions across the industry since 2024, compounding the feeling among younger workers that the system is not designed for them.
The financial services industry has noticed the change. Betting platforms and fintech apps are increasingly promoting themselves to younger users with language borrowed from investing, offering “wallets” betting and “research tools” that blur the line between trading and betting. European regulators have started cracking down on prediction markets that straddle that same border, with Spain blocking Polymarket and Kalshi for operating without gaming licenses.
In the United States, the regulatory landscape is more permissive. Thirty-eight states and Washington, D.C., now allow some form of legal sports betting, up from just one state in 2018. The expansion has been driven by state governments attracted by tax revenue and a Supreme Court ruling that overturned the federal ban on sports betting.
A few caveats about framing are worth noting. Sacks is a financial influencer and content creator, not an economist, and her conclusions are based on anecdotal observations and the experience of her audience rather than peer-reviewed research. The gaming industry’s record revenues alone do not prove that young people gamble instead of save; They could reflect broader population growth in legal markets, more connected states, or increased spending by existing bettors across all age groups.
The correlation between financial anxiety and gambling behavior is well documented in academic literature, but correlation is not causation. Some young adults may gamble because they feel financially desperate, others may gamble for entertainment, and the two groups likely overlap in ways that the available data do not clearly separate.
What the numbers do clearly show is that a generation facing record housing costs, significant student debt, and a shrinking entry-level job market is also gambling at historically high rates, and that the financial consequences of that gambling are falling disproportionately on the youngest and most economically vulnerable gamblers. Whether that represents a rational response to an irrational economy, as Sacks maintains, or a dangerous defense mechanism exploited by a rapidly expanding industry, depends on which side of the bankruptcy statistics you fall on.
