On July 23, President Donald Trump appeared at the White House and promised that American families’ electricity bills would increase. “It actually goes down.” even as power-hungry AI data centers spread across the network. t
The vehicle was an enlarged version of the Taxpayer protection commitmenta voluntary plan first introduced in March. What energy analysts noticed was mainly what he left out.
The pledge calls on companies that build data centers, including Amazon, Google, Meta, Microsoft, OpenAI, Oracle and xAI, to fund or build the electrical infrastructure their facilities demand rather than passing the cost on to existing ratepayers.
The administration had already indicated that extend the scheme to public servicesand the new version reaches, by the White House’s own count, almost 200 additional signatories, including NextEra Energy, Duke Energy, rural cooperatives and a group of Republican governors.
Trump claimed that the commitment now covers about 80% of the energy delivered to American homes and businesses, and that companies given the right to build their own plants would be able to sell excess energy to the grid, which would reduce rates. It offered no capacity targets, timelines or measurable milestones.
The 💜 of EU technology
The latest rumors from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise founder Boris and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Register now!
That silence matters, because the pressure on household bills is already well documented. AI data centers have increased energy bills In parts of the industrial Midwest and at PJM Interconnection, the largest U.S. network operator, data centers accounted for $6.3 billion of the $16.4 billion in charges in the most recent capacity auction, about 38%, according to the network’s report. independent market monitor.
“PJM continues to act like it’s business as usual.” Joseph Bowring, president of the monitor, said of the change. “You have to open your eyes and recognize that this is really a paradigm shift and that not doing it imposes costs on other customers.”
The promise is not binding and that is the central objection. It carries no penalties or compliance oversight, and a quirk of federal rules can prevent signatories from complying even when they want to.
Current interconnection rates socialize grid upgrade costs among all customers, and as FirstEnergy argued in a filing with regulators in 2026, existing rules can prevent a company from covering its own infrastructure costs even if it chooses to do so.
Consumer advocates were direct. Jesse Lee, of the campaign group Climate Power, called the pledge a “pinky promise,” and a Consumer Reports survey found that 75% of American adults did not trust that big developers would actually cover all their costs.
The Brookings Institution researchers added that federal statutes “cannot easily override” state utility commissions that actually set residential rates.
There is another wrinkle. Some of the same companies that signed the pledge have fought state-level rules that would force them to comply, consumer groups say, making the voluntary version seem less like a largesse than the softer of two options.
The White House has presented the plan as proof that AI development can continue without punishing households.
The forecasts are not reassuring either. Consulting firm ICF has estimated that data centers could increase U.S. electricity demand by 25% by 2030 and add up to 40% to monthly bills within five years, and utilities are planning about $1.4 trillion in capital spending by the end of the decade to keep up.
Louisiana, for its part, projects $2.6 billion in taxpayer savings over 15 years thanks to its agreement with Meta, a reminder that local arithmetic can work both ways.
Congress has addressed the problem on its own and the House has presented a proposal data center energy cost billalthough there is nothing on the books yet that forces hyperscalers to pay.
The only body that could give force to the commitment is the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, which has already begun to fast network connections for large loads. In June, it ordered six regional network operators to justify or reform the way they charge those users, by an August deadline.
Until those rules change, the promise will remain what its critics say it is: a promise made in a room, with no one obligated to keep it.
