TL;DR
Victoria proposes “unmasking” powers to force platforms to identify anonymous accounts in defamation cases. It would also make it easier for families to sue the platforms for harm to children.
Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan announced on Sunday that the state would propose laws giving Victoria’s civil and administrative court the power to order social media and artificial intelligence platforms to reveal the identities of anonymous account holders accused of online defamation. He “unmask“The powers would be the first of their kind for an Australian state. Allan said families needed new ways to protect their children online.
The proposed reforms go beyond identity disclosure. Victoria would also remove the legal threshold that currently requires families to prove that a child has suffered a permanent disability of at least 10% before suing platforms for negligence causing psychiatric harm. That threshold, assessed by doctors using standardized calculations, has made it effectively impossible for most families to claim damages. Removing it for claims brought on behalf of minors would open a new channel of litigation against the platforms in Australian courts.
The timing is tight. Victoria has four weeks of sitting before the state election in November, and the opposition said the laws were unlikely to be passed in time. Shadow attorney general James Newbury said the Coalition supported the effort in principle, but “I don’t think Elon Musk is watching Jacinta Allan’s ad today and shaking.” Australia’s world-leading under-16 social media ban is already having trouble enforcingand testers found that age verification systems are easy to circumvent. Adding unmasking powers to a regime that still cannot verify who is under 16 raises questions about whether the infrastructure exists to enforce them.
The 💜 of EU technology
The latest rumors from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise founder Boris and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Register now!
Marilyn Bromberg, a specialist in social media regulation at the University of Western Australia, called the reforms “a brave start” but said they should go beyond defamation and encompass defamation and cyberbullying. The Australian Senate delayed fixes to the social media ban earlier this year.and the federal government is still working on an enforcement framework that would force platforms to comply. Victoria’s measure adds a state-level litigation tool to a federal regulatory structure that remains incomplete. Whether platforms respond to the threat of injunctions in a single Australian state depends on whether the political signal lasts longer than the election cycle.
